GEORGE WILL’S COLUMN ON NIXON EMPHASIZES THE ROLE OF LAPSED TIME IN PROVIDING THE WHOLE TRUTH OF A HISTORICAL EVENT
As I read George Will’s latest column in the Sunday Ledger-Enquirer , I had to reflect on the experiences I had in Dr. Craig Lloyd’s Columbus College’s (now Columbus State University) historiography class. When I researched for a paper on the role that yellow journalists William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal and Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World newspapers played in starting the Spanish-American War, what really stood out was that, generally, histories written contemporaneously could not be trusted as much as those written years or decades after the events depicted.
That doesn’t mean that contemporary history doesn’t have value. Many historians believe it is very valuable, but new information revealed over the years can revise what was believed to be factual when written contemporaneously.
Now, forty years after Watergate, we learn why former President Richard Nixon risked his presidency by ordering that notorious burglary. George Will reported in his column that ran in the Sunday Ledger-Enquirer that Ken Hughes, who studied the Nixon tapes for more than ten years, points out in his book, Chasing Shadows: the Nixon Tapes, the Chennault Affair, and the Origins of Watergate, that “Nixon ordered the crime in 1971 hoping to prevent the public knowledge of a crime he committed in 1968.” Will says Nixon’s prior crime in 1968 was to interfere, as a private citizen, with U.S. government diplomatic negotiations concerning the Vietnam War. He said Nixon was worried that supposed documents in a safe in the Democratic headquarters would reveal “his role in sabotaging negotiations that might have shorten the war.”
A lot of historical documents are sealed by public figures for opening at a future date after the owners of those documents have been dead for, say, 50 years. So, historically, the microscope of time plays a big role in giving us the whole truth about historical events.
Unionization attempts, pay for play, player product endorsements etc. issues are threatening the very existence of college football, he says.
Retired University of Georgia football coach and athletic director Vince Dooley, who is now a consultant for Kennesaw State University’s new football program, saved the most controversial part of his talk to the Rotary Club of Columbus until the very end of his very entertaining talk. After getting a lot of laughs about his years at Georgia, he made the point that to start paying players would bring about the end of college football.
He said giving the players a full scholarship and adding a cost of attendance payment should be enough. He also wants a law passed to regulate those payments. If such a law is not enacted, he said, the colleges would get into bidding wars for the best players, driving the costs so high college football would be dismantled. He also pointed out that if a school pays football players it will have to pay the atheletes in the other programs.
Well, how about a law regulating what coaches can make? That would stop bidding wars for the best coaches. While we’re at it, we could regulate pay for professional sports stars and coaches. Could such regulations be considered a restraint of trade?
It’s really hard to make the case for not paying players who take great physical risks when their coaches are being paid millions of dollars, and the schools are raking in many millions more.
I suppose we should clarify that by saying “some top-tier school” are raking in those millions. I’ve read where only the top-tier schools make money on their athletic programs. Most of them lose money on those programs.
What a time to be reading Scott Anderson’s Lawrence in Arabia. The moment I saw the book’s cover, I knew I had to read it because one of the most impressive movies I have ever seen is David Lean’s 1966 masterpiece epic Lawrence of Arabia.
With the daily Middle East horrors being shown just about every day on TV, it’s interesting the learn how the modern Middle East was formed a hundred years ago when World War One started in 1914, and the role that T.E Lawrence played in that formation, and about how the United Kingdom and France arbitrarily drew up the borders of the Middle East nations that resulted in the carving up o the defeated Ottoman empire. It also delves into the beginning of the formation of Israel. And it tells us about early American involvement in it all.
The full and very appropriate title of the book is Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East.
President Carter Says China is Headed Toward Having the World’s Largest Christian Population
As usual, when he is there, the Maranatha Baptist Church at Plains, Georgia was packed Sunday morning. A new friend who formerly lived in South Dakota, Bill Harlan, had said that he and his wife Marjorie, would like to attend one of President Jimmy Carter’s Sunday school classes. So Carol and Don Nahley, Sidney and Ed Wilson, the Harlan’s, and Julie Bray and I motored to Plains. It was a delightful experience.
On October first, President Carter will be 90. You would never know it by the way he conducts his Sunday school class. He is still not only intellectually impressive and witty, but does not move like a man who has been around that long. He was on his feet and in motion for the entire lesson, which lasted almost an hour.
The main point of his talk was that all Christians are missionaries, that Christ himself was a missionary. After normalizing relations with China in 1979, he tried to get missionaries back into the country. He asked for three things: Freedom of religion, the printing of bibles, and allowing missionaries back into China. He got two of them. China agreed to allow freedom of religion and the printing of bibles, but it wouldn’t allow missionaries to return. Now, President Carter said, China is on its way to having the world’s largest Christian population. Sometimes it only takes one person to get the job done and, it seems, one missionary to China, President Jimmy Carter, was the man to do it.
As I read the news about John Wayne’s estate engaging in a legal battle with Duke University over the use of the name Duke, it reminded me of the time I had a drink with the Duke.
The estate wants to put the name “Duke” on the label of bottles of Kentucky bourbon. Duke University reportedly opposes that idea. From personal experience, I know that Wayne did like bourbon.
He had just finished shooting some scenes for The Green Berets, a film about the Vietnam War at Fort Benning. Meeting him on location the night before, I had so upset him when I asked if he was making a propaganda movie that he cut the interview short and stormed off, saying, “You’re just trying to provoke me. I’m trying to make an entertaining movie.”
The next morning his publicist called me to say that Duke felt bad about the episode with me, that he had been upset by something else and that he would give me another interview if I wanted it. The publicist and I met him at his apartment after that day’s filming. He gave me his famous smile and a hardy handshake, explained that he had been in a bad mood the night before because of problems he was having with one of his actors who had a drinking problem, said he understood I was just doing my job and I could ask him anything I wished. I responded by honestly telling him I was a fan and had really enjoyed his latest movie in the theaters, The War Wagon. He invited me to join him at the apartment’s kitchen table to do the interview. He also asked me if I would like to have a bourbon and water with him. Usually, I didn’t drink on the job, but there was no way I was going to not have a drink with John Wayne.
I interviewed him for an hour. He gave me a lot of interesting inside stories about such things as the mafia’s influence in Hollywood. I sent both the short interview from the night before and the hour interview to CBS. They only used the one with the verbal fireworks from the night before.
Rotary International’s theme this year is Light Up Rotary, and carrying the torch for that effort in Columbus is Ryan Clements. He just became president of the Rotary Club of Columbus. Greg Camp, last year’s president, passed the torch to Ryan at Wednesday’s meeting.
President Ryan – local Rotarians stick to first names – said, “This is an exciting theme for me because it encourages all of us to tell the Rotary story and to invite our family and friends to celebrate Rotary with us.” I can’t go into all of the Rotary story in this short space, but I can tell you that a major part of it is supporting the Rotary Foundation, which raises hundreds of millions of dollars to help people in parts of the world who. as Ryan says. “would otherwise go without basic necessities such as clean water, proper sanitation, and fundamental nutrition.”
Vice-President Greg, who is an executive at the National infanrty Museum, said that the drive for Rotary Foundation Funds during his term as president exceeded its goal. In order to keep that ball rolling and hopefully raise impressive funds for Rotary’s “greatest cause, the eradication of polio,” President Ryan, who is in the construction consulting business, will lead the club in reviving the 1983 Run to the Sea, a relay race of 275 miles from Columbus to Jekyll Island. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has committed to match funds for polio eradication 2 to 1 up to $35 million a year through 2018.
When you add this effort to all of the other services Rotary offers the Columbus community, local Rotarians should have no problem at all Lighting Up Rotary by spreading the word on how remarkable the Rotary experience can be.
And, a belated Happy Resolution of Independence Day. July 2nd, 1776 was the day that the Continental Congress passed the Resolution of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was signed and dated on July 4th, 1776. Bet you didn’t know that. Neither did It until I looked up Independence Day on Wikipedia.
Being a UU, I know that Unitarian Universalists do not have a creed, but UU communities affirm and promote Seven Principles. The Fourth one, “a free and responsible search for truth and meaning,” is the one that concerns us for this post. I am examining how that principle applies to the body of work that I have produced for this blog, which is a Personal blog. WordPress, which hosts more than 60 million websites including this one, says Personal “is the broadest category and includes blogs about personal topics like politics, music, family, travel, health, you name it.”
Since I started this blog in 2008, there have been 690 posts. There is no way we can examine each one, so let’s take a look at the one that has gotten and continues to get the most hits. The August 19, 2009 post AN EMOTIONAL WILLIAM CALLEY SAYS HE IS SORRY not only continues to get a lot of hits, but continues to get comments from readers.
Former Army Lt. William Calley, the only person convicted of participating in the massacre of hundreds of Vietnamese civilians during the Vietnam War, including a lot of women and children, used the occasion of speaking to the Kiwanis Club of Greater Columbus (Georgia), to apologize for his role in the war crime. My report was picked up by the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer, carried by all McClatchey newspapers , and fed by the L-E to the Associated Press, causing it to be reported around the world.
I can’t speak for others, so I’ll just concentrate on what I see to be true in the report. One significant truth to me is that some human beings of any nationallity are capable of unspeakable acts. Another one is that not only are some people incapaable of that, but they will actively oppose those who are.
What’s the meaning of the story? For one thing, to me, it again raises the point that war is an insane way for nations to resolve conflicts. For another, it shows that political leaders can get a lot of people killed unnecessarily and can be disingenuous about justifying their lethal actions.
I realize that it may have an entirely different truth and meaning for you. Please feel free to click on the comment button and let me know how you feel about the subject. I do request that comments be civil, not too profane, and sans name calling.
We Need Legislators Who Support Public Education
HERE’S MORE EVIDENCE THAT TOO MANY DON’T
It is very disheartening to see what those who control the Georgia Legislature are doing to our state’s public school system. The evidence became even more abundant when I learned about the tentative Muscogee County School District’s 2014 budget.
The state is cutting MCSD $21 million in funding for the year. That brings to #141 million cut by the state over the past 12 years. How can we believe lawmakers who say they support public education when they do this?